(Krasske) Levkov 2009 Category: Asymmetrical biraphid
BASIONYM: Amphora montana Krasske 1932
Valves are semi-lanceolate, with a smoothly arched dorsal margin, and straight to slightly convex ventral margin. Valve ends are protracted, narrowly rostrate and ventrally curved. The raphe is located near the middle of the valve, gently arched with proximal raphe ends slightly deflected dorsally. The axial area is narrow, although somewhat difficult to resolve on the ventral side. The central area on the dorsal side forms a thickened semi-stauros extending to the dorsal valve margin, a ventral fascia is present and extends to the ventral valve margin. Dorsal and ventral striae are difficult to resolved in LM.
Basionym: Amphora montana
Author: Krasske 1932
Length Range: 9-15 µm
Width Range: 4-6 µm
Striae in 10 µm: 36
Cite This Page:
Stepanek, J., and Kociolek, P. (2011). Halamphora montana. In Diatoms of the United States. Retrieved September 14, 2014, from http://westerndiatoms.colorado.edu/taxa/species/halamphora_montana
Species: Halamphora montana
Reviewer: Rex Lowe
Krasske, G. (1932). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Diatomeenflora der Alpen. Nova Hedwigia 72(3): 92-135.
Levkov, Z. (2009). Amphora sensu lato. In Diatoms of Europe, Volume 5. (H. Lange-Bertalot, ed). A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G. 916pp.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) study was completed during the years 2000-2004 (see citations at bottom of this page). Over 1200 streams and rivers in 12 western states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming) were selected for sampling based on a stratified randomized design. This type of design insures that ecological resources are sampled in proportion to their actual geographical presence. Stratified randomized design also allows for estimates of stream length with a known confidence in several “condition classes” (good or least-disturbed, intermediately-disturbed, and poor or most-disturbed) for biotic condition, chemistry and habitat.
Results are published in:
Johnson, T., Hermann, K., Spaulding, S., Beyea, B., Theel, C., Sada, R., Bollman, W., Bowman, J., Larsen, A., Vining, K., Ostermiller, J., Petersen, D. Hargett, E. and Zumberge, J. (2009). An ecological assessment of USEPA Region 8 streams and rivers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 Report, 178 p.
Stoddard, J. L., Peck, D. V., Olsen, A. R., Larsen, D. P., Van Sickle, J., Hawkins, C. P., Hughes, R. M., Whittier, T. R., Lomnicky, G. A., Herlihy, A. T., Kaufman, P. R., Peterson, S. A., Ringold, P. L., Paulsen, S. G., and Blair, R. (2005). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) western streams and rivers statistical summary. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report 620/R-05/006, 1,762 p.
Stoddard, J. L., Peck, D. V., Paulsen, S. G., Van Sickle, J., Hawkins, C. P., Herlihy, A. T., Hughes, R. M., Kaufman, P. R., Larsen, D. P., Lomnicky, G. A., Olsen, A. R., Peterson, S. A., Ringold, P. L., and Whittier, T. R. (2005). An ecological assessment of western streams and rivers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report 620/R-05/005, 49 p.