(Reimer) Kingston 2003 Category: Monoraphid
BASIONYM: Achnanthes deflexa Reimer 1966
Contributor: Marina Potapova - May 2009
Length Range: 7.4-28.3 µm
Width Range: 3.1-5.3 µm
Striae in 10 µm: 15-28 in the middle of raphe valve
Valves are linear-elliptical to elliptical with subrostrate ends. The raphe valve is concave. The raphe valve possesses a linear axial area, which widens slightly in the middle portion of the valve. The terminal raphe fissures are hooked towards the same side of the valve and are slightly expanded at the ends. Externally, the central raphe ends are teardrop-shaped. Internally, the central raphe ends curve to opposite sides. The rapheless valve is convex. It has a narrow, linear axial area widening slightly in the middle. Striae are parallel or very slightly radiate throughout both valves. Striae density of the raphe valve is 16-28 in 10 µm in the middle and 35-50 in 10 µm at the apices. Striae density of the rapheless valve is 15-26 in 10 µm in the middle and 30-35 in 10 µm at the apices. The external openings of the areolae are transapically elongated, appearing as narrow slits. Each stria in the middle part of the valve is composed of 4-5 areolae. Very short marginal striae are often present in the middle portion of the valve.
Basionym: Achnanthes deflexa
Author: Reimer 1966
Length Range: 7-25 µm µm
Width Range: 3.8-4.5 µm
Striae in 10 µm: 20-22 in the center valve, 28-30 at the ends
Valve linear-elliptical to elliptical with extremities varying from subtlely protracted subrostrate to obtusely rounded, not protracted. Raphe valve with narrow, linear axial area curving at the ends; central area small, elongate-elliptical or lacking. Raphe filiform; proximal raphe ends close; distal ends curved or deflected in the same direction, subterminal. Striae parallel or very slightly radiate. Indistinctly punctate; more distant at the center of the valve than at the ends. Pseudoraphe valve with narrow, linear pseudoraphe; no distinct central area. Striae parallel or slightly radiate; indistinctly punctate. Striae, 20-22 in 10 µm at the center, becoming about 28-30 in 10 µm near the ends on both valves. Length, 7-25 µm. Breadth, 3.8-4.5 µm.
Original text and images reproduced with permission by Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
Kingston, J.C. (2000). New combinations in the freshwater Fragilariaceae and Achnanthidiaceae. Diatom Research 15(2): 409-411.
Kingston, J.C. (2003). Araphid and Monoraphid Diatoms. In: Freshwater Algae of North America. Ecology and Classification (J.D. Wehr and R.G. Sheath, eds). Elsevier Science pp. 595-636.
Patrick, R.M. and Reimer, C.W. (1966). The Diatoms of the United States exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii, V. 1. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 13.
Potapova, M. and Ponader, K.C. (2004). Two common North American diatoms, Achnanthidium rivulare sp. nov. and A. deflexum (Reimer) Kingston: morphology, ecology and comparison with related species. Diatom Research 19(1): 33-57.
Although formation of mucilagenous stalks was never observed in A. deflexum, this species might be able to produce stalk as other Achnanthidium species.
Sampling for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) study was completed during the years 2000-2004 (see citations at bottom of this page). Streams and rivers in 12 western states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming). Over 1200 sites on streams and rivers in 12 western states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming) were selected for sampling based on a stratified randomized design. This type of design insures that ecological resources are sampled in proportion to their actual geographical presence. Stratified randomized design also allows for estimates of stream length with a known confidence in several “condition classes” (good or least-disturbed, intermediately-disturbed, and poor or most-disturbed) for biotic condition, chemistry and habitat.
Results are published in:
Johnson, T., Hermann, K., Spaulding, S., Beyea, B., Theel, C., Sada, R., Bollman, W., Bowman, J., Larsen, A., Vining, K., Ostermiller, J., Petersen, D. Hargett, E. and Zumberge, J. (2009). An ecological assessment of USEPA Region 8 streams and rivers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 Report, 178 p.
Stoddard, J. L., Peck, D. V., Olsen, A. R., Larsen, D. P., Van Sickle, J., Hawkins, C. P., Hughes, R. M., Whittier, T. R., Lomnicky, G. A., Herlihy, A. T., Kaufman, P. R., Peterson, S. A., Ringold, P. L., Paulsen, S. G., and Blair, R. (2005). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) western streams and rivers statistical summary. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report 620/R-05/006, 1,762 p.
Stoddard, J. L., Peck, D. V., Paulsen, S. G., Van Sickle, J., Hawkins, C. P., Herlihy, A. T., Hughes, R. M., Kaufman, P. R., Larsen, D. P., Lomnicky, G. A., Olsen, A. R., Peterson, S. A., Ringold, P. L., and Whittier, T. R. (2005). An ecological assessment of western streams and rivers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report 620/R-05/005, 49 p.